takina
Top 6 Forward
Posts: 322
|
Post by takina on Oct 23, 2017 17:25:03 GMT
Boy oh boy but we'd better get 2 points here
|
|
|
|
Post by jen on Oct 23, 2017 19:11:16 GMT
Boy oh boy but we'd better get 2 points here You'd like to think so but who knows! |
|
hidehi
Third Line Grinder
Posts: 80 
|
Post by hidehi on Oct 25, 2017 22:21:45 GMT
Well that was an interesting training session. At least they brought 2 netminders with them unlike in previous seasons when they would borrow a local rec NM as backup.
|
|
takina
Top 6 Forward
Posts: 322
|
Post by takina on Oct 25, 2017 22:33:28 GMT
Well -job done.
Personally I felt sorry for Edinburgh, short short benched and 4 games to play between now and Sunday with 3 of those away, down on players or not on what planet that is considered fair is beyond me. Credit to team and their fans for sticking at it for the full 60 mins and I genuinely hope their fortunes improve.
From a Blaze perspective my question is this - Pacquette, more asset than liability or more liability than asset?
|
|
|
|
Post by jen on Oct 26, 2017 5:35:58 GMT
I can't believe their netie got away without a penalty, he was 3rd man in. I thought Nasti was going to go down and sort it himself. We didn't even get out of 2nd gear was embarrassing for caps.
|
|
|
|
Post by blazeblue on Oct 26, 2017 7:59:23 GMT
Well -job done. Personally I felt sorry for Edinburgh, short short benched and 4 games to play between now and Sunday with 3 of those away, down on players or not on what planet that is considered fair is beyond me. Credit to team and their fans for sticking at it for the full 60 mins and I genuinely hope their fortunes improve. From a Blaze perspective my question is this - Pacquette, more asset than liability or more liability than asset? Agree with this. Although glad of the win I feel sorry for caps and their fans. As for Paquette, I think he could become a liability. I don't understand why Bebris isn't used, he's a decent player, so hope he isn't going to be treated as another Klotz from last season. |
|
scott
Third Line Grinder
Posts: 92
|
Post by scott on Oct 26, 2017 8:33:27 GMT
Paquette took exception I believe to the fact the Caps player submarined rather than took the incoming hit.
The netty wasn't called for third man in as the Caps player on the floor wasn't classed as a willing combatant. I got told that by Pering last night.
Why the 5+G call for the use of the blocker wasn't called baffles me. Even if he doesn't punch with the edge of it. He had his stick and blocker in his hand as he hit Paquette.
|
|
|
|
Post by jen on Oct 27, 2017 17:36:59 GMT
Dops given Paquette a 2 game ban ,also upgraded the caps netminders penalty and given him a 2 game ban.
|
|
